GTS 250 is high end. You also forgot the fact that the OP only has a 1280 x 1024 monitor, therefore the CPU does a lot more work (compared to 1680 x 1050 and above).
The GTS 250 is a mainstream product, high end is the 285, 295 and the 295 x2.
Read through that CPU VS GPU article a bit and take a look at the benchmarks. For instance with a 9800GTX the dual core at 2.4ghz is about 9 frames per second lower than a processor running near 3ghz.
If you scroll down to the 9800GTX with the core 2 quad q6600 you'll see that the increase in clock speed from 2.4ghz to 3.2ghz actually end up losing them a tenth of a frame....so at this resolution the CPU isn't the limiting factor.
My Computer
System One
-
- CPU
- AMD Phenom x4 9600 Agena
- Motherboard
- Asus M3A-H/HDMI
- Memory
- 8GB OCZ Fatal1ty PC2-6400
- Graphics card(s)
- Powercolor Radeon HD4830
- Monitor(s) Displays
- HP W2408h, Gateway VX1100
- Screen Resolution
- 1920x1200, 1600x1200
- Hard Drives
- Maxtor 200GB IDE (x2) WD Caviar SE16 640GB SATA (x2)
- PSU
- CoolerMaster eXtreme Power Plus 500w
- Case
- CoolerMaster ATCS 210
- Mouse
- MS Wireless Mouse for Bluetooth
- Keyboard
- MS Wireless Keyboard for Bluetooth