Vista's Defrag blows

JK DEFRAG.....

great, simple, quick...;)

i dont entertain the vista defragger either...i think the idea of having it run in the background & using hardly any resources were its downfall

good in theory ...bad in practice
 

My Computer

System One

  • Manufacturer/Model
    ME.....
    CPU
    Q9450 @ 3.6ghz
    Motherboard
    P5K PREMIUM
    Memory
    8GB 1066mhz buffalo firestix
    Graphics card(s)
    HD 5970
    Monitor(s) Displays
    20'' syncmaster
    Screen Resolution
    1680x1050
    Hard Drives
    160GB 7200RPM SEAGATE BARRACUDA IDE 160GB 7200RPM SEAGATE BARRACUDA SATA 2
    PSU
    XCILIO 850w
    Case
    unknown ATX
    Cooling
    Arctic cooler pro 775
    Mouse
    logitech cordless optical
    Keyboard
    logitech EX110
    Internet Speed
    2mb

My Computer

System One

  • Manufacturer/Model
    Self built
    CPU
    Intel E8400 3GHz
    Motherboard
    Intel DX48BT2
    Memory
    Kingston PC3-10666 4Gb
    Graphics card(s)
    XFX 9800 GTX XXX
    Sound Card
    Soundblaster X-Fi XtremeMusic
    Monitor(s) Displays
    2x Samsung SM-T220HD 22"
    Screen Resolution
    1680x1050 on two monitors
    Hard Drives
    WD Raptor X/150Gb in RAID0 WD Raptor 36gb 3x Samsung F1 1Tb
    PSU
    Thermaltake ToughPower 850w
    Case
    Thermaltake Armor
    Cooling
    Tuniq Tower 120
    Mouse
    Razer Diamondback 3G
    Keyboard
    Dell Multimedia Enhanced USB
    Internet Speed
    8128/832
    Other Info
    Thermaltake Muse esata caddy
The thing is that its not all about "how fast I can defrag" it about the quality of the defrag. Some of these free programs are great if you just want a quick defrag and you want to see a pretty picture, but they are certainly not doing the same work as windows defrag. For instance, the built in version optimizes how shadow copy files are arranged. So don't kid your self thinking oh its slow and this sucks, ya its slow because its moving programs around on your hard drive not just moving bits of files around. I believe some of these programs like diskkeeper also rearranges programs so they start faster (moves them to the edge of the disk).
 
Last edited:

My Computer

System One

  • CPU
    AMD 3800 X2
    Motherboard
    Asus A8N32-SLI Dlx
    Memory
    4Gb DDR
    Graphics card(s)
    2x MSI 8500GT OC in SLI
    Hard Drives
    2x Western Digital 250GB RAID 0
I'll have to agree (after reading only the first page) that Auslogics is really fast, reasonably effective, and free. I've used O&O, Paragon, and Raxco PerfectDisk - the last one is comparably quick and can also defragment system files, and will tell you when you need to. Now, though, I use a combination of Paragon and O&O - the first when the system is very severely in need of a block-by-block defragment, including the MFT (be VERY careful with this - in the event of a power failure, you're in serious trouble), and the latter just to tune up while I work or while the screensaver runs.

Paragon doesn't really tell you what it's doing while it does it, just gives you a simple progress bar, but O&O has an extremely comprehensive and interactive cluster-by-cluster display in case that's your think. Either is plenty to take care of your system, but for some reason I like having both.
 

My Computer

System One

  • CPU
    Mobile DualCore AMD Turion 64
    Motherboard
    Wistron 30D6
    Memory
    2048 MB Dual DDR2 SDRAM
    Graphics card(s)
    GeForce 7150M / nForce 630M
    Hard Drives
    160 GB Toshiba MK1637GSX
Back
Top