I remember when system restore was first introduced by MS people said don't use it it's a hog, chews up disk space, bad for the environment etc etc.
 
I for one have found system restore to be stable and some times worth it's weight in gold, it's normally a precursor to me reinstalling a previously saved disk image.
 
If you get that many failures I'd look to some other cause, personally I can't recall it ever failing me and we use it in a commercial environment without issues.
 
It was not designed to re clone a disk or re-build an OS, it was designed to re-generate the registry and replace system files overwritten or removed for some reason, in doing that it has a position on my system
				
			I for one have found system restore to be stable and some times worth it's weight in gold, it's normally a precursor to me reinstalling a previously saved disk image.
If you get that many failures I'd look to some other cause, personally I can't recall it ever failing me and we use it in a commercial environment without issues.
It was not designed to re clone a disk or re-build an OS, it was designed to re-generate the registry and replace system files overwritten or removed for some reason, in doing that it has a position on my system

 
	 
 
		 but will keep looking out for an answer,and post  same,Harry email me if ya discover anything  ,thanks to all for taking the time to reply
 but will keep looking out for an answer,and post  same,Harry email me if ya discover anything  ,thanks to all for taking the time to reply  
 
		 , and I guess that can be said about almost everyone who ask questions at, or contribute too, Tech forums like this. We are the folk who discover probably 75% of the Problems & Fixes for MS and the other S'ware makers out there.
, and I guess that can be said about almost everyone who ask questions at, or contribute too, Tech forums like this. We are the folk who discover probably 75% of the Problems & Fixes for MS and the other S'ware makers out there.