SP1 FINAL (oem partner download)..

Here it is, 32 and 64 bit bundled together (DVD ISO):

Sign In

You must have a membership (which is free) to download this release.

 

[sahitanand]

BTW is there any rapidshare links for the SP1??

 

[sahitanand]

holy *%ap 31524 kb/s ??
what a 700 Mb movie in what.....an instant ??

 

[inc188]

which torrent should i dowload.. i dont wanna download 1gb worth of the wrong stuff..

@sahitanand - what is Wu too? and how did you download it thru there?

 

[grimreaper]

Here's the link:
Vista SP1 Final

 

[HECKMO]

hi, been reading these forums for some time but this is my first post,
first off thank you all for loadsa helpfull info,
secondly i found this link, not sure if its real, and its really slow downloading (im still looking at 12hours so it says)
but it might be some use to those who arent oem partners

Free - Envoyez vos documents

 

[sahitanand]

WU is windows update.
hey microsoft has not pulled down the SP1. i just downloaded yesterday afternoon
again its about 130Mb for me

 

[mathews2010]

yeah u pulled yesterday afternoon...i tried today about 3 hours ago

 

[GSi-R]

Im running 32Bit Vista Business. Is it worth me downloading Sp1? I don't want to try this if its going cause problems. Im currently happy how my laptop is running.

Thanks

 

[silverfox55]

Have just downloaded the full version from the OEM site. Installed it (took 75 mins ) then at the very end I got the message that the service pack did not install and then gave error code 0xC004F013. Ane to make matters worse the was a message on the screen saying that my version was not genuine when I know that this OEM version came from MS as part of the upgrade program last year. Has anybody had this problem ??

 

[ripbox]

silver fox try running a disk error check then look for any updates in the update system then re install SP1... that worked for me
i used the RTM version though

edit: if you are unable to install SP1 because you have missing updates that will not install / give error codes such as 80073712 then try my quote below)

if you are unable to find pending.xml the try running Error checking this fixed it for me :D
the chances are also if you have still been unable to fix this till now you will have other upates that will also not install
and without these updates you cannot install SP1

solution directions:

start - computer - right click C:/ - properties - tools - Error checking - check now - reboot - wait for vista to boot fully (no HDD activitie) - start - control pannel - windows update - check for updates (dont skip this part) - reboot - install SP1 - enjoy :D

 

[silverfox55]

After seeing the message that vista was not genuine, I re-validated vista (without problems), rebooted and tried again later. This worked without problems, in fact the process was only half the time. This would suggest that if the validation key in the registry is not set properly then SP1 will not install. Pity it could not do that at the start of the procedure. All seems fine at the moment but will have to wait and see.

Many thanks for the the help on the subject.
Point to note though on any dodgy copies of Vista.

 

[chilloh]

I installes sp1 today as you can see below.

but if you look at the image below you can see that only windows vista ultimate x64 (6.0.6001) but you can't see that sp1 is installed so what's up with that??

 

[grimreaper]

Don't worry it's there...just to prove to you, I also took a snapshot of mine...you see?
So, yes, SP1 is installed

 

[chilloh]

thanks for clearing that up

but on other users you can see sp1 there thoes it matter?

 

[grimreaper]

nope ...as long as it's on ur updates as successfully installed, dats all it matters

 

[03hdfatboy]

I was downloading the ISO from MS site when I left to go to work today. I would have left the one I had already installed on it but when I noticed that the one frome MS was 1.3 Gb and the one I had was only 700+ mb I thought maybe there is something missing.

 

[DjLevel9]

my recomadation down load the ISO SP1 cause Microsoft lied to us they said on the radio on the news on the web sites and The Teir 3 Tech support OPS said they Wern't gonna bother those who used the crack version cause vista had so many flaws right from the start now they changed there mind and put in this update to do well it's gonna be removed where taking them to court over this our radio station had the Interview with Microsoft spokes person stating they wert gonna touch those who had the crack version and where gonna let it go and continue with the Sp1 as schedualed some fked up again shoot the person for release it shame on him/her who sent the file update out smarten up Microsoft.

 

[techtr]

Here's the link:
Vista SP1 Final

Thanks for the link..And i have a question, is it multilanguage?

 

[DjLevel9]

Here's the link:
Vista SP1 Final

Thanks for the link..And i have a question, is it multilanguage?

6001.18000.080118-1840_iso_client_sp_wave0-frmcsp0_dvd
1.13GB is The FULL RTM version Just Comfired it so everybody's wondering if it is or not yes it is case closed lol

it was just handed out in a Diffrent Country In English and Broken down In The English Version.

GAWD it pays to be on top of no wonder why We Have Migrains lol

 

[Rob Redbeard]

my recomadation down load the ISO SP1 cause Microsoft lied to us they said on the radio on the news on the web sites and The Teir 3 Tech support OPS said they Wern't gonna bother those who used the crack version cause vista had so many flaws right from the start now they changed there mind and put in this update to do well it's gonna be removed where taking them to court over this our radio station had the Interview with Microsoft spokes person stating they wert gonna touch those who had the crack version and where gonna let it go and continue with the Sp1 as schedualed some fked up again shoot the person for release it shame on him/her who sent the file update out smarten up Microsoft.

define:sentence - Google Search

Yes, indeed it is Microsoft that needs to "smarten up."

They made it pretty clear that they were going to address the exploitations that were letting some people steal software.

Nobody will successfully take them to court for the content of future-looking statements they may have said about what their future software update will contain. If the readme tells you it won't address that issue, but it does, then you'd have a possible (albeit EXTREMELY weak) case.

Finally, your justification that they not address piracy because you or others feel that the quality of their initial release was poor, makes absolutely no sense. You would seem to assert that they have an obligation to provide with and you have some human right to receive pirated software free and clear of any flaws. On the contrary, if the initial release was of poor quality, then only paying customers had any right to use it and any right to have those flaws repaired.

If you steal my car with old tires on it, you have no right to sue me if I won't give you a free set of new tires.

Good day sir,
Rob