Introducing Windows 7

Hi there, Mike Nash here.
For me, one of the most exciting times in the release of a new product is right before we show it to the world for the first time. And that time is right now.

In a few weeks we are going to be talking about the details of this release at the PDC and at WinHEC. We will be sharing a pre-beta "developer only release" with attendees of both shows and giving them the first broad in-depth look at what we've been up to. I can't wait for them to see it.

And, as you probably know, since we began development of the next version of the Windows client operating system we have been referring to it by a codename, "Windows 7." But now is a good time to announce that we've decided to officially call the next version of Windows, "Windows 7."

While I know there have been a few cases at Microsoft when the codename of a product was used for the final release, I am pretty sure that this is a first for Windows. You might wonder about the decision.

The decision to use the name Windows 7 is about simplicity. Over the years, we have taken different approaches to naming Windows. We've used version numbers like Windows 3.11, or dates like Windows 98, or "aspirational" monikers like Windows XP or Windows Vista. And since we do not ship new versions of Windows every year, using a date did not make sense. Likewise, coming up with an all-new "aspirational" name does not do justice to what we are trying to achieve, which is to stay firmly rooted in our aspirations for Windows Vista, while evolving and refining the substantial investments in platform technology in Windows Vista into the next generation of Windows.

Simply put, this is the seventh release of Windows, so therefore "Windows 7" just makes sense.
We are very excited about the opportunity to tell you more about Windows 7 in the coming weeks, and show you how we have continued to build on investments begun in Windows Vista to deliver on the next release of the Windows operating system.

I look forward to sharing more with you in the coming weeks and months.

--Mike

Source:- http://windowsvistablog.com/blogs/windowsvista/archive/2008/10/13/introducing-windows-7.aspx



See also: Windows Vista Team Blog : Why 7?
 
First....have you seen my hardware specs? I would call that decent. True, it's not an i7, but a core2duo e8400 is more than ok....
Second... I'm not saying it's all that bad, I am saying I want it to be better than what it is, less bloated. "Not that bad" still leaves room for improvement. And that's what I want, improvement. I want win7 to at least feel as fast as windows XP. One way to achieve that is to have more efficient code, to have less bloat and to have less integrated programs which aren't really needed for the actual running of your system.

Don't get me wrong, I love Vista, and I never want to go back to XP, but MS is going to come out with Win7, and if I can state my wishes for win7, which is what I'm doing, then those are my wishes, those are my hopes for the new OS.
 

My Computer

System One

  • CPU
    Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 3.0 Ghz
    Motherboard
    Asus P5K Pro
    Memory
    2 times 2GB Kingston (paired) DDR2 PC 6400
    Graphics card(s)
    9600GT 512MB
    Monitor(s) Displays
    Samsung SyncMaster 226 CW
    Screen Resolution
    1680X1050
    Hard Drives
    74GB 10.000 rpm WD raptor 750 GB Samsung F1 750 GB Samsung F1 2 WD 500 GB drives
    PSU
    Recom Power Engine 600 Watt
    Case
    Apevia X-cruiser Blue
    Cooling
    Auras CTC-868 CPU cooler; 7 Zalman 120mm, 1 Papst casesooler
    Mouse
    Logitech wireless trackball
    Internet Speed
    50 mbit synchronous fibreglass connection
Vista x64 needs alot of RAM and fast drives. The newer games will need a higher end video card than most have because games will be blu-ray DVDs. I am running a file server worth of hardware on Vista x64 Ultimate.

pair of E5430 2.66 GHz quad core Xeons
16GB DDR667 RAM
SAS RAID cached controller with 128 MB DDR667 cache
RAID 1 on Seagate Savvio 10K 146GB SAS drives

Vista x64 Ultimate installs in 18 minutes.

Looking at a 4870x2 for around Christmas.

I want Windows 7 to better use the 12 MB cache on each Xeon better. Format drive C: for 512 bytes per cluster for better use of the drives. Be able to optimize the locations of registry, temp files, and paging files automatically so the drive does not fragment as much.

My drive speeds are incredible
http://www.scsiraidguru.com/Computers/X7DWA-N/Benchmark/Sandra_SAS_RAID1.txt

8 Cores means no waiting and everything can run at the same time
http://www.scsiraidguru.com/Computers/X7DWA-N/Benchmark/Sandra_CPU_Arith.txt

I do need a faster video card than a 8800 GTS 640MB.

Vista x64 Ultimate is fast because my CPU, RAM and storage are server grade.
 

My Computer

System One

  • CPU
    pair of Intel E5430 quad core 2.66 GHz Xeons
    Motherboard
    Supermicro X7DWA-N server board
    Memory
    16GB DDR667
    Graphics card(s)
    eVGA 8800 GTS 640 MB video card
    Hard Drives
    SAS RAID
Back
Top