:DHere's one for the initiates: is it unheard of to dual-boot Vista x64 on a dual-core computer with x32 on an external drive (same software package)?
:DHere's one for the initiates: is it unheard of to dual-boot Vista x64 on a dual-core computer with x32 on an external drive (same software package)?
:DHere's one for the initiates: is it unheard of to dual-boot Vista x64 on a dual-core computer with x32 on an external drive (same software package)?
Why would you want to have both Vista x64 and Vista x86 installed? Sure, for compatibility, many people dual-boot between XP and Vista (I still can't understand why...)
But Vista x64 does perform better than it's x86 counterpart, so by dual-boot between the two?
Why would you want to have both Vista x64 and Vista x86 installed? Sure, for compatibility, many people dual-boot between XP and Vista (I still can't understand why...)
But Vista x64 does perform better than it's x86 counterpart, so by dual-boot between the two?
Why would you want to have both Vista x64 and Vista x86 installed? Sure, for compatibility, many people dual-boot between XP and Vista (I still can't understand why...)
But Vista x64 does perform better than it's x86 counterpart, so by dual-boot between the two?
In my case, I dual boot x86/x64. I use some high end programs that really take advantage of x64, but I use x86 as my regular OS because it's better suppoerted...for now. I like having the choice. When Vista was new, I dual booted XP/Vista for several months. I ran Vista, but if I got stuck, I had XP to fall back on.
Paul
It is good to have a fall back, however by doing this you are not finding out how to force the software to work with vista or finding alternitive software that will do the same job.