Direct X11 graphics cards, 2010

Ok Guys, with the release of Windows 7 and the start of 2010 is on our doorsteps we will see big things!- new programs brought out exploiting parellelism (using multithreading processing and our graphics cards to break down complex tasks)

We will see 64-bit OS's become the "norm" for the majority of desktop users as anything less than 4Gb's of ram should be reserved for netbooks and mobile phones.

New hardware-
the infamous core i9's will come out (codename: gulfstream) and we will see 6 cores with 12 threads (hyperthreading) screaming out of our computers at light speed, because of course - there is always over-clocking potential.
Solid state drives will be cheaper, mainstream society will have at least one for their OS's, and gamers will have another for their games, 2Gb platter HDDs will be for media.
Along with the release of Sata 3 and USB 3.0 alot will change!

Speed, we will get it in the bucketloads! But the varience in motherboards, core i5 core i7 core i9 will be hard to grasp for the end user and first time builders will find themselves confused and in the dark.

But now we get into serious STUFF DIRECT X11 so what will it offer new? (what Direct X 10 should have delivered and more- ahem Nvidea)
But perhaps the most interesting revelation in the gaming world is the addition of a new contestant with a new product to the ever-competing ATi and Nvidia, the chipzilla giant Intel. Releasing its Larrabee architecture will be interesting, with Nvidia screwing up architecture by trying to copy larrabee's theoretical design (wasting time) and not being able to adjust the die shrink of their own GPU's, not being able to get a new contract for the games console industry for Sony, Nintendo or Microsofts next platforms, the green age will come to a halt for about a year or so (until it gets its act together).
Then we have ATI - die shrinks, more ROPS more stream processors.. will we see the emergance of a single card reaching 3 teraflops per second? only time will tell.
Intel.. Larrabee, the more processors on a chip wafer, the more power it has... duh! - but for every extra chip apparently doubles its GPU power.... we'll see about that intel, interesting, but I want to know more about this platform and the architecture.

So what do you guys want next year? 24GB ram DDR3 Triple Channel 2400Mhz lowest clock timings ever, with a Corei9 able to overclock by 5 Ghz on stock coolers and 10Ghz on liquid cooling, Ati 5000 series, Nvidia GT400 series or Larrabee? Solid state drives offering 500Gb at $50 a pop, or all this being able to run on a 200W PSU.
Tell me your thoughts people
 

My Computer

System One

  • Manufacturer/Model
    Self Built
    CPU
    Core2Quad Q9550 @ 2.83Ghz O.C'd to 3.86Ghz
    Motherboard
    XFX Nvidia 790i Ultra SLI
    Memory
    4x2GB Corsair DDR3@ 1333Mhz
    Graphics card(s)
    Asus Nvidia GTX 280
    Sound Card
    Creative PCI Express X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Pro Series
    Monitor(s) Displays
    Benq 24in 1920x1080, Viewsonic 22in 1680x1050
    Screen Resolution
    1920x1200 + 1680x1050
    Hard Drives
    Samsungx2 750GB SATA II 32MB SATA Hard Drive RAID 0 array
    PSU
    Antec 850Watt
    Case
    Cooler Master Cosmo S 1100 Extended ATX No PSU Aluminium Blk
    Cooling
    7x 120mm Fans
    Mouse
    Logitech G7, Logitech G9
    Keyboard
    Logitech Dinovo Edge, Logitech Dinovo Mini
    Internet Speed
    24Mbit p/s
Ok Guys, with the release of Windows 7 and the start of 2010 is on our doorsteps we will see big things!- new programs brought out exploiting parellelism (using multithreading processing and our graphics cards to break down complex tasks)

We will see 64-bit OS's become the "norm" for the majority of desktop users as anything less than 4Gb's of ram should be reserved for netbooks and mobile phones.

New hardware-
the infamous core i9's will come out (codename: gulfstream) and we will see 6 cores with 12 threads (hyperthreading) screaming out of our computers at light speed, because of course - there is always over-clocking potential.
Solid state drives will be cheaper, mainstream society will have at least one for their OS's, and gamers will have another for their games, 2Gb platter HDDs will be for media.
Along with the release of Sata 3 and USB 3.0 alot will change!

Speed, we will get it in the bucketloads! But the varience in motherboards, core i5 core i7 core i9 will be hard to grasp for the end user and first time builders will find themselves confused and in the dark.

But now we get into serious STUFF DIRECT X11 so what will it offer new? (what Direct X 10 should have delivered and more- ahem Nvidea)
But perhaps the most interesting revelation in the gaming world is the addition of a new contestant with a new product to the ever-competing ATi and Nvidia, the chipzilla giant Intel. Releasing its Larrabee architecture will be interesting, with Nvidia screwing up architecture by trying to copy larrabee's theoretical design (wasting time) and not being able to adjust the die shrink of their own GPU's, not being able to get a new contract for the games console industry for Sony, Nintendo or Microsofts next platforms, the green age will come to a halt for about a year or so (until it gets its act together).
Then we have ATI - die shrinks, more ROPS more stream processors.. will we see the emergance of a single card reaching 3 teraflops per second? only time will tell.
Intel.. Larrabee, the more processors on a chip wafer, the more power it has... duh! - but for every extra chip apparently doubles its GPU power.... we'll see about that intel, interesting, but I want to know more about this platform and the architecture.

So what do you guys want next year? 24GB ram DDR3 Triple Channel 2400Mhz lowest clock timings ever, with a Corei9 able to overclock by 5 Ghz on stock coolers and 10Ghz on liquid cooling, Ati 5000 series, Nvidia GT400 series or Larrabee? Solid state drives offering 500Gb at $50 a pop, or all this being able to run on a 200W PSU.
Tell me your thoughts people
I want a decent game lineup made for the better rigs. Let me rephrase, I want a decent NON-FPS game lineup with better beta testing (No more new games being unplayably buggy............. Glares at Bioware&Bethesda.............)!
 

My Computer

System One

  • Manufacturer/Model
    Home built
    CPU
    phenom IIx4 810
    Motherboard
    m4a79t deluxe
    Memory
    8Gb DDR3 OCZ Platinum AMD Edition
    Graphics card(s)
    evga 295 co-op and 9800 gtx for PhysX
    Monitor(s) Displays
    Mk241H
    Screen Resolution
    1920x1200
    Hard Drives
    Seagate Barracuda 7200 750Gb
    PSU
    ABS Tagan BZ 800W
    Case
    Xclio A380PLUS-BK Fully Black
    Cooling
    Asus Royal Knight
    Mouse
    Logitech 5 button tilt wheel laser (don't remember model#)
    Keyboard
    Razor Lycosa Mirror edition
    Internet Speed
    Wireless Road Runner
I want a decent game lineup made for the better rigs.

I agree with this. I am sick of being able to max out any game and still having plenty of computational power left in my GPU. I spent over $500AUD on my GPU and I would like $500 worth of visuals each and every second of my gaming time.

Let me rephrase, I want a decent NON-FPS game lineup with better beta testing (No more new games being unplayably buggy)

I like the beta testing idea but I look to the heavens above and pray for a biblical flood of FPS games in Q4 2009 and 2010. What can I say? I love shooting.

Down with 'strategy' games like Tom Clancy's End War.
 

My Computer

System One

  • Manufacturer/Model
    Custom Build
    CPU
    E6750 @ 3.6GHz
    Motherboard
    Gigabyte P35 DS3
    Memory
    4GB 8500C5D
    Graphics card(s)
    POV GTX285
    Sound Card
    Onboard
    Monitor(s) Displays
    19" Widescreen LG
    Screen Resolution
    1400x900
    Hard Drives
    2 x WD 500G
    PSU
    Coolermaster Silent Pro 700M
    Case
    Antec 900
    Cooling
    Tuniq Tower 120 LFB
    Mouse
    Logitech MX400
    Keyboard
    Logitech EX110
    Other Info
    Graphics Driver - 190.38
Back
Top