I would like other user's experiences and opinions with the setting of Windows Update Service.
If I do allow updates, should I let them be automatic? How should I set defaults in the Update Service?
Here is why I ask if I should allow the updates:
1. One of my serious corruption problems that prompted me to restore my system from a backup was that a Windows update failed, reverted and resulted in my .Net Framework 2.0 from working. My system was OK prior to that update.
2. In the old days I never used a new software update until it had been in general use for over 6 months. This still seems to be valid since we have SERVICE PACKS that correct for early problems. Why should I allow a Microsoft update to install as soon is it is avaliable (it is, afterall, a new program module).
3. I have seen updates that both provide new features and modify old ones. This can be bad or good. It would be nice to know more details about what an update will do. I have seen changes in my Outlook that have been good ones, but surprised me. I don't normally like surprises, however. I also know of updates that have taken features away.
4. I see a lot of problems showing in the forum that people have after an update. Why should I expose myself to added potential problems when I have no problem with the way Windows worked before an update?
5. An automatic update often reboots my computer. I am often logged into my computer for weeks at a time. I like that stability knowing it is up with my programs logged in and ready.
By the way... I have had MANY more problems with my system due to Microsoft screwups than I have ever had due to viruses, trojans, etc. I have a good firewall and I never open suspicious emails. I have 4 recent backups (including a continuous backup) on a RAID 0 drive, a separate computer with critical files. I also keep an original backup just after a restore. I have had Norton anti-virus up to my recent restore (due to the Windows update that failed). Over a year period it never found much more than a tracking cookie.
If I do allow updates, should I let them be automatic? How should I set defaults in the Update Service?
Here is why I ask if I should allow the updates:
1. One of my serious corruption problems that prompted me to restore my system from a backup was that a Windows update failed, reverted and resulted in my .Net Framework 2.0 from working. My system was OK prior to that update.
2. In the old days I never used a new software update until it had been in general use for over 6 months. This still seems to be valid since we have SERVICE PACKS that correct for early problems. Why should I allow a Microsoft update to install as soon is it is avaliable (it is, afterall, a new program module).
3. I have seen updates that both provide new features and modify old ones. This can be bad or good. It would be nice to know more details about what an update will do. I have seen changes in my Outlook that have been good ones, but surprised me. I don't normally like surprises, however. I also know of updates that have taken features away.
4. I see a lot of problems showing in the forum that people have after an update. Why should I expose myself to added potential problems when I have no problem with the way Windows worked before an update?
5. An automatic update often reboots my computer. I am often logged into my computer for weeks at a time. I like that stability knowing it is up with my programs logged in and ready.
By the way... I have had MANY more problems with my system due to Microsoft screwups than I have ever had due to viruses, trojans, etc. I have a good firewall and I never open suspicious emails. I have 4 recent backups (including a continuous backup) on a RAID 0 drive, a separate computer with critical files. I also keep an original backup just after a restore. I have had Norton anti-virus up to my recent restore (due to the Windows update that failed). Over a year period it never found much more than a tracking cookie.