d.dassledoof
New Member
Its time for me to renew my antivirus and im stuck deciding between these two. I want want something with minimal system impact but still does a good job keeping my computer safe. Eset seems like a solid choice, but I 've also read a lot of good things about the new norton 360 3.0. A lot of bad things too, but im really wondering if these are just people who hate norton and havent tried the latest version or if theyve actually compared the two. I would agree that the past nortons sucked also. I used to have it a couple years ago and switched because it slowed my computer down. Some articles say its a little better than eset but I just dont know what to believe. Norton is 10 bucks cheaper. Right now Im running Vista 64 but i plan on upgrading to 7. I also game on my PC so having low impact on performance is important. Im also going to use it on a build for my mom, who is a complete computer novice, so I suppose simplicity is somewhat important as well. Any suggestions would be helpful.