What's the final verdict? Ghost 14 or True Image 2009?

S

sabrewulf

New Member
This is for Windows 64bit.. I can't decide which one to get. I go to product reviews on a couple different sites and there seems to be somewhat of a divide with users saying to go with Ghost and vice versa.

I have never used Ghost before. So I can't personally say anything on it from experience. As for True Image, I am 1 for 1 on it. I managed to restore an image without any problems on one computer, but had a corrupted backup image on the other. So I'm not sure what buy now.

Any feedback is appreciated.
 

My Computer

System One

Your personal experience should tell you to go with TI2009. It does work with Vista 64
 

My Computer

System One

  • Manufacturer/Model
    Custom Built
    CPU
    Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 2.4GHz
    Motherboard
    Intel D975XBX2
    Memory
    Corsair TWIN2X4096-PC8500 (2x2GHz)
    Graphics card(s)
    ATI Radeon HD 4890 (1GHz)
    Sound Card
    X-Fi Titanium - Fatality Pro Series
    Monitor(s) Displays
    hp w2207h (22" widescreen)
    Screen Resolution
    1680 x 1050
    Hard Drives
    One 750GB, 2x500GB Western Digital Caviar Black Hard Drives (32meg)
    PSU
    Antec Neo HE 550
    Case
    Antec P182
    Cooling
    Zalman CNPS9500 AT
    Mouse
    Logitech MX Revolution
    Keyboard
    Logitech Wireless Wave
    Internet Speed
    "High" Speed DSL? Is that like low speed FIOS?
    Other Info
    Q6600 B3 Revision OC to 3.0GHz

My Computer

System One

  • Manufacturer/Model
    HP tx2000z
    CPU
    AMD Turion 64 X2 TL-68 Gold Edition
    Motherboard
    Quanta 305E/nVidia nForce 430
    Memory
    4096MB DDR2 PC2-5300 @ 5-5-5-15
    Graphics card(s)
    nVidia GeForce Go 6150 64MB
    Sound Card
    Realtek HD Audio/Altec Lansing
    Hard Drives
    250GB 5400RPM SATA
    PSU
    8 Cell Lithium Ion Battery
    Case
    HP Echo tx2000z
Hi Sabrewulf,

As this is Classic Disaster recovery software and you are likely to be using this in the worst of circumstances, unless a particular package offers distinct advantages, which you need, stick to what you know. The last thing you need in an emergancy is to have to learn how to use the software ;)
 

My Computers

System One System Two

  • Operating System
    Windows 10 Pro x64 Latest Release Preview
    Monitor(s) Displays
    Acer G276HL 27", (DVi) + Samsung 39" HDTV (HDMI)
    Screen Resolution
    2 x 1920x1080 @50Hz
  • Manufacturer/Model
    Real World Computers (Custom by Me)
    CPU
    AMD FX8350 Vishera 8 Core @4GHz
    Motherboard
    Asus M5A78L-M USB3
    Memory
    32GB [4x8GB] DDR3 1600 MHz
    Sound Card
    ASUS Xoner DG + SPDIF to 5.1 System + HDMI
    Monitor(s) Displays
    Samsung 32" TV
    Screen Resolution
    1920 x 1080
    Hard Drives
    Internal Crucial CT256MX100SSD1 256GB SSD, Seagate ST2000DM001-1CH1 2TB, External (USB3) Seagate Backup+ Hub BK SCSI Disk 8TB 2.5/3.5 Hot Swap Cradle, USB3 + eSata (client HDDs) NAS 4TB
    PSU
    Aerocool Templarius Imperator 750W 80+ Silver
    Case
    AeroCool X-Warrior Red Devil Tower
    Cooling
    Hyper103 CPU, Rear 120mm, Front 2x120mm, Side 2x120mm
    Internet Speed
    68 MB Down 18.5 MB Up
    Other Info
    Six Sensor Auto / Manual Digital cooling (Fan) control with Touch control Panel
Acronis True Image is usually recommended more often than Norton Ghost, however:

Having just tested both, although I found Acronis True Image to work excellent when used from a bootup CD, the product was less than usable when imaging from Windows. Acronis tech support has no answer as to why ALL drives and partitions need to be analyzed *every time* you start the program even if you don't need them and just wish to quickly image one partition. Click after click after click to get the job done, waiting for the drive to be locked as many as three times...


Meanwhile, people despise Symantec but for imaging a partition/OS from Windows, Norton Ghost gets the job done quicker, no waiting for all drives to be analyzed or repeatedly locked.
 

My Computer

System One

I have been a Ghost customer for years. I just switched to TI.

On Vista x64 Ghost 14 made incrementals just as large as the original image. This was a well known bug in Ghost for months (of denials by Symantec). A few days ago I upgraded (LiveUpdate) to the latest version on two machines.

One machine: Lost all DVD and CD drives. Audio driver failed. Downgraded to old version (via System Restore).

The other: File system corruption. Instability. Could not produce a backup. Finally got things quiet again and my serial numbers no longer worked.

Just run around after run around from Norton support. Screw them. I'll send my money elsewhere.
 

My Computer

System One

Hi All... I'll put my 2 cents in...

I have Vista 64bit and NEITHER Acronis True Image or Norton Ghost 14 would run properly. Both created image files.... neither could find them to restore. Calls, emails, live support on the web produced any results except lots of frustration. Acronis has not responded to my 2 emails. Norton has told me I am missing drivers and to contact my computer vendor (HP). HP says it Acronis' responsibility call them!

In the end I downloaded Macrium Relect and LOOOOVE IT. It creates AND restores !!!! I purchased the software, instead of using the free stuff for 2 reasons. The paid version has more options and I want to be nice and support the people who make it. i.e. I want to keep them working!

Right now I restoring my HP back to it's out of the box state, then to my settings, and installing my other software. All along the way I will be making images in case something goes astray.

So for me, after trying Acronis and Ghost, it's a NO BRAINER...

MACRIUM REFLECT IS THE WAY TO GO !​
 

My Computer

System One

You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top