Footloose1949
Member
Many years ago I was an Atari user hooked up to a HD. If/when the OS crashed, I never had to reinstall all the software back onto the machine, because GEM-TOS, held this stuff in a separate folder outside the OS. Now this sounds to me an extremely logical way of working, and with the vast amounts of memory and computing speed of modern PCs, I just cannot understand and am puzzled why MS Windows, doesn't/hasn't implemented the same principle. After all, it's only going to take a few nanoseconds to read data held in a folder outside the OS, instead of burying 'bits' of Apps, deep inside the OS.
Is there a logical reason why MS cannot or don't want to do the same thing? Just think of the hours of misery users would no longer be subjected to, if you could reinstall windows without having to also reinstall all their software again! I'm wondering if there is a patent/copywrite on this type of configuration, which prevents them from implementing something like this?
If the Windows OS installed the data other Apps need to put inside the OS, and also saved a copy of it, in another folder OUTSIDE the OS, when you have to reinstall the OS, the install process could read the contents of this file, and put this stuff back into the OS when you reinstall Windows. Why not employ a 'plug-in' system similar to what Adobe uses on many of their products.
Is there a logical reason why MS cannot or don't want to do the same thing? Just think of the hours of misery users would no longer be subjected to, if you could reinstall windows without having to also reinstall all their software again! I'm wondering if there is a patent/copywrite on this type of configuration, which prevents them from implementing something like this?
If the Windows OS installed the data other Apps need to put inside the OS, and also saved a copy of it, in another folder OUTSIDE the OS, when you have to reinstall the OS, the install process could read the contents of this file, and put this stuff back into the OS when you reinstall Windows. Why not employ a 'plug-in' system similar to what Adobe uses on many of their products.
My Computer
System One
-
- Manufacturer/Model
- HP m9465uk
- CPU
- Quad CPU Q9300 @2.5GHz
- Memory
- 4.0 Gb
- Monitor(s) Displays
- NEC MultiSync20wgz2